Timer
00:00:00
Start Pause Reset
102 Comments Previous / NextHelp

Tough Sudoku for 2/February/2006

                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 

Choose a number, and place it in the grid above.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Check out the latest post in the Sudoku Forum

Watch Amazing Blindfold Sudoku Solving Video

Submitted by: basscom4life

Indicate which comments you would like to be able to see
Wemaaq  From AK
Party animal!
 From
Sweetie - in case gb doesn't see your question - I think he means consider 1's in column g to eliminate f7=1....(g7=1, f7 <>1; g4=1,h6=9, f6=1, f7 <>1); BTW, I didn't get the remote pairs either.
 From
Sweetie - the comment above was from me - didn't mean to be anonymous!
Christina  From Newfoundland/France
Eeek. Maybe this time my name will show up
joe b ontario  From
i know dogs like beer
cats are a new one for the suds
good mAen all
Alison  From Suffolk, UK
6.52
Jaffy  From Manaus
3:41 I taut I saw a puddycat!!! I d-i-d, I d-i-d!
Remember: 'Miller... High Life... the Champagne of Bottled Beerssssss!' It's the Cat in the Pack!! Good to see a cat again.
Mike  From Iowa City
Easy to:
7 1 9 4 _ _ _ 6 _
5 8 4 2 _ 6 3 7 _
6 2 3 7 _ _ _ 4 _
3 4 5 8 2 _ 7 _ 6
1 _ 7 _ 4 _ _ _ _
8 _ 2 _ _ 7 _ _ 4
2 5 8 _ 7 4 6 _ _
9 3 1 5 6 8 4 2 7
4 7 6 _ _ 2 5 8 _
FC: (h6=9)==(f6=9)--(f6=1)==(f7=1)--(g7=1)== (g7=9)--(g4=9); g4=1 ez to end
Ty Sarah  From Lady Sunshine from Germany

Thats a great joke!

Haven't done tough jet. Only manage them sometimes without guessing. Hard is nearly always sure without guessing.
Mike  From Iowa City
Save game never works for me on one of my computers, not sure why. I do not use the ARP as often as I used to, so not sure about that.
Tazmanian Boxers  From North Carolina
Over 30 minutes! This one was very Tough. I couldn't get it. I guess after the others being so easy, I had to make up for it. Nice picture, I wonder if he had to drink his way in there? See you all tomorrow.
sweetie  From us
Merci Christina, Thanks Mike! That made sense once it was spelled out for me :))
Ross Taylor  From London, England
Only 13, serious butt-kicker - 8.34 on the tough - lol :) I also got second best recorded score on the easy!!!!
Bern  From Nebr, USA
This was very tough for me, and took over two hours. Sometimes I go like crazy, but today was a brain freeze!!
Cat Lady  From Long Island
There's an end to that cat!

7:26 total time (with one interruption from my boss); 4:23 setup, so 3:03 for solving.
gb  From france
complete graphic solution in sandbox.

Mike from Iowa : I try to make a difference between easy fillings and eliminations. The ground level for sudokus could be defined as those needing only easy fillings. Then we can measure level-1 puzzles by the number of sets needed considering to perform the eliminations leading to new easy fillings.

'(g5=8)==(i5=8) forbids {f5=8, e5=8, d5=8}'

is a very easy elimination, but it's not a cell filling so I count it for 1 set. cont...

Nurn  From Galway
Alistair, my brother used to tell that joke as: Q. What's the difference between a duck? A. One leg is both the same.
gb  From france
The whole elimination effort in that puzzle is :

'(g5=8)==(i5=8) forbids {f5=8, e5=8, d5=8}' (locked cand)-->31 filled
(c1=3)==(c7=3)--(c7=6)==(c1=6) forbids {c1=4} (hidden pair)
(a3=2)==(b3=2)--(b3=5)==(a3=5) forbids {a3=9} (hidden pair)
(f6=1)==(h6=1)--(g4=1)==(g7=1) forbids {f7=1} (colors).

so : 7 sets examined and depth (max number of sets used to perform an elimination)=2.

Your chain has depth 3 and needs previous (easy) eliminations, so we may consider your solution as heavier.
gb  From france
Nurn : that's too short ! my version was (to be spoken veeeryyy sloooww) : 'There's no difference between a duck , it has the two legs the same, especially the left'.
Christina  From Newfoundland/France    Supporting Member
Mike, the 'save game' worked for a while for me, then not, then mysteriously for a few days, but now it's gone again. I tried changing IExplorer to 'allow intersession cookies' but no change...'
Mike  From Iowa City
If I am understanding correctly, if it is a simple box/line/column elimination it does not count as a set. You then count the number of total strong to weak links(set), and then multiply that by the most sets used in a single step. The chain I used required depth three, and had two additional sets. I would have then used 9 sets with depth 3 for a total of 27. Correct?
Steve  From Ohio    Supporting Member
This puzzle is fairly easy - not sure it is worth the effort to find the easiest solution. If one does pair eliminations after 52 filled, then cells evaluate to 19. There are remote pairs here, and they let 19 be eliminated further from f7 & e4. This solution seems a bit too complicated, though for such an easy puzzle.
Steve  From Ohio    Supporting Member
If at 52 filled I do no eliminations, colors on 1's trivially solves h6=9, easy to end.
Nurn  From Galway
gb - yeah, I like your version better!
gb  From france
Mike :
when there's only one value left in a column/row/box/cell, you fill that value : that's what I call easy fillings.

what sets to count ? those who need to be checked as 'thick' on the grid. Once checked, the proof can be read without further examining of the grid, e.g :

(f6=1)==(h6=1)--(g4=1)==(g7=1)

W e must check on the grid that either f6 or h6=1 (ie the set of possible 1s in row 6 reduces to {f6=1, h6=1}) and that either g4 or g7=1. Then we no more need the grid to tell that o
gb  From france
... Then we no more need the grid to tell that one among f6,g7 is 1 : if f6 is not 1, then h6=1, g4 is not 1, g7=1, which forbids f7=1.

In other words : thin links can be checked on the fc without looking at the grid.

And there's no multiplying...
Richard  From Czech Republic
Sarah, loved the joke!!! Not even goimg to attempt the puzzle. Good maeN everyone!!!!
Richard  From Czech Republic
OOps - seems I mistyped my last comment, but if you're all clever enough to do this one, then I'm sure you'll figure out what I meant. Bye!!
Mike  From Iowa City
Thanks for the further explanation. I understand it now. I really love the forbidding chain technique. It is basically a catch-all for all other techniques. I looked at some of your proofs in the sandbox on the 14th of January and then it finally started to make sense. Before I had only looked at the beginners section and had not looked at any of the proofs. It opened up a brand new set of possibilities to solve. It is starting to click now, so I like the idea of searching for efficiency.
gloria  From kuala lumpur,malaysia
hellie  From queensland
liked the joke. good maen to all
howardl  From dc
you know what I love about this site? Nobody is mean.
andrĂ©  From england    Supporting Member
39:48 'nough said. Hi to all.
cathy  From country, south australia
Hi everyone!
paul  From just kidding
Hey howardl -- Who asked you?!!!
Eden  From Austrailia
my cat loves boxes too. she also eats rubber bands. so don't think her taste counts for much. it must be why she licks he bum, to get the rubber taste out of her mouth.
cathy  From canada
no timer
GiGi  From Sylacauga Alabama    Supporting Member
10:43...Pass me a Miller please Good meaN to all
Con  From Perth
Very, very tough for me for some reason. Time wasn't worth talking about. I'll check the site cb mentioned as I don't know about 'remote pairs' or 'locked pairs'.
vance lee  From sea
gb
can you finish after f7 is not 1? cant seem to finish from there
Please Log in to post a comment.

Not a member? Joining is quick and free. As a member you get heaps of benefits.

Join Now Login